Quick Navigation
Topics
Qubit Coherence Noise Stability Characterization
Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing
Frequency Feedback for Two-Photon Interference from Separate Quantum Dots
arXiv
Authors: Michael Zopf, Tobias Macha, Robert Keil, Eduardo Uruñuela, Yan Chen, Wolfgang Alt, Lothar Ratschbacher, Fei Ding, Dieter Meschede, Oliver G. Schmidt
Year
2017
Paper ID
2586
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
86
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We employ active feedback to stabilize the frequency of single photons emitted by two separate quantum dots to an atomic standard. The transmission of a single, rubidium-based Faraday filter serves as the error signal for frequency stabilization to less than 1.5% of the emission linewidth. Long-term stability is demonstrated by Hong-Ou-Mandel interference between photons from the two quantum dots. The observed visibility of Vlock=\(41 pm 5\)% is limited only by internal dephasing of the dots. Our approach facilitates quantum networks with indistinguishable photons from distributed emitters.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Spin Qubits & Silicon Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2017 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We employ active feedback to stabilize the frequency of single photons emitted by two separate quantum dots to an atomic standard.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.