Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance Quantum Simulation

Transversal AND in Quantum Codes

arXiv
Authors: Christine Li, Lia Yeh

Year

2026

Paper ID

25804

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

197

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The AND gate is not reversible$\unicode{x2014}$on qubits. However, it is reversible on qutrits, making it a building block for efficient simulation of qubit computation using qutrits. We first observe that there are multiple two-qutrit Clifford+T unitaries that realize the AND gate with T-count 3, and its generalizations to $n$ qubits with T-count $3n-3$. Our main result is the construction of a novel qutrit $\mathopen{\[\![} 6,2,2 \mathclose{\]\!]}$ quantum error-correcting code with a transversal implementation of the AND gate. The key insight in our approach is that a symmetric T-depth one circuit decomposition$\unicode{x2014}$composed of a CX circuit, T and T dagger gates, followed by the CX circuit in reverse$\unicode{x2014}$of a given unitary can be interpreted as a CSS code. We can increase the code distance by augmenting the code circuit with additional stabilizers while preserving the logical gate. This results in a code with a "built-in" transversal implementation of the original unitary, which can be further concatenated to attain a $\mathopen{\[\![} 48,2,4 \mathclose{\]\!]}$ code with the same transversal logical gate. Furthermore, we present several protocols for mixed qubit-qutrit codes which we call Qubit Subspace Codes, and for magic state distillation and injection.

Paper Tools

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Compare Add to Reading List

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #25804 #28075 Entanglement renormalization an... #28072 Semiclassical evolution of corr... #28051 New scenarios for classical and... #28048 $\mathbb{Z}_3$ Parafermionic Ch...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.