Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance Quantum Simulation

Macromux: scalable postselection for high-threshold fault-tolerant quantum computation

arXiv
Authors: Patrick Birchall, Jacob Bridgeman, Christopher Dawson, Terry Farrelly, Yehua Liu, Naomi Nickerson, Mihir Pant, Sam Roberts, Karthik Seetharam, David Tuckett

Year

2026

Paper ID

25782

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

151

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We introduce a new resource-efficient scheme for fault-tolerant quantum computation known as `macroscale multiplexing' (or simply `Macromux'), that utilizes scalable postselection to significantly improve the threshold of a given fault-tolerant protocol against both Pauli and erasure errors. Macromux is a hierarchical method for postselecting on constant-size space-time windows of a fault tolerant protocol, requiring only constant additional overheads. The method can be straightforwardly implemented for any fault-tolerant protocol and in any architecture that has access to routing and memory, such as linear-optical fusion-based architectures. We construct fault-tolerant protocols that, to our knowledge, have the highest thresholds in the literature; we perform simulations of fusion-based schemes based on the surface code, showing a maximum possible increase in Pauli thresholds of up to a factor of $\sim6$ (from $1.0\%$ to $5.9\%$). Our schemes are highly-resource efficient, and can for example, double the loss thresholds of some photonic fusion-based protocols using as little as $3 \times$ overhead.

Paper Tools

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Compare Add to Reading List

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #25782 #51897 Tradeoffs on the volume of faul... #51894 To break, or not to break: Symm... #51890 Bounds on Atomistic Disorder fo... #51884 Absence of quantum Darwinism as...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.