Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Classical shadows for non-iid quantum sources
arXiv
Authors: Leonardo Zambrano
Year
2026
Paper ID
25773
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
128
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Classical shadow tomography has emerged as a powerful framework for predicting properties of quantum many-body systems with favorable sample complexity. Standard theoretical guarantees, however, rely on the assumption that experimental rounds are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.). This idealization is often violated in practice, where parameter drift, environmental noise, and active feedback generate history-dependent sequences of states or channels. To address this, we introduce a robust classical shadow protocol based on a truncated mean estimator. We prove that its sample complexity for predicting properties of the time-averaged state or channel matches the standard i.i.d. scaling governed by the shadow norm, even when experimental rounds depend arbitrarily on the past. Our results establish the robustness of the shadow formalism beyond the i.i.d. regime.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Classical shadow tomography has emerged as a powerful framework for predicting properties of quantum many-body systems with favorable sample complexity.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.