Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum advantages for syndrome-aware noisy logical observable estimation
arXiv
Authors: Kento Tsubouchi, Hyukgun Kwon, Liang Jiang, Nobuyuki Yoshioka
Year
2026
Paper ID
25771
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
183
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Recent progress in fault-tolerant quantum computing suggests that leveraging error-syndrome information at the logical layer can substantially improve performance, including the estimation of logical observables from noisy states. In this work, based on quantum estimation theory, we develop an information-theoretic framework to quantify the utility of error syndromes for noisy logical observable estimation. We distinguish two operational regimes of such syndrome-aware protocols: classical protocols, in which the logical measurement basis is fixed and syndrome information is used only in classical post-processing, and quantum protocols, in which the logical quantum control can be tailored to depend on the observed error syndrome. For classical syndrome-aware protocols, we prove a universal limitation: on average, syndrome information can improve the effective logical error rate by at most a factor of two, implying at most a quadratic reduction in sampling overhead. In contrast, once syndrome-conditioned quantum control is permitted, we exhibit settings in which the effective logical error rate decays exponentially with the number of logical qubits. These findings provide fundamental guidance for designing future fault-tolerant architectures that actively exploit syndrome records rather than discarding them after decoding.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Recent progress in fault-tolerant quantum computing suggests that leveraging error-syndrome information at the logical layer can substantially improve performance, including...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.