Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Superconducting Qubits
Quantum Foundations
Decay Rates in Interleaved Benchmarking with Single-Qubit References
arXiv
Authors: Ilya A. Simakov, Arina V. Zotova, Tatyana A. Chudakova, Alena S. Kazmina, Artyom M. Polyanskiy, Nikolay N. Abramov, Mikhail A. Tarkhov, Alexander M. Mumlyakov, Igor V. Trofimov, Nikita Yu. Rudenko, Maxim V. Chichkov, Vladimir I. Chichkov, Grigoriy S. Mazhorin
Year
2026
Paper ID
25749
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
148
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Cross-entropy benchmarking (XEB) with single-qubit reference sequences is widely used to characterize multi-qubit gates in large-scale quantum processors, despite the lack of a rigorous theoretical justification. Here we show that the commonly employed additive single-qubit errors approximation underlying this approach breaks down and leads to a systematic overestimation of gate fidelities. We derive an analytical expression for the joint decay of simultaneous single-qubit reference sequences and introduce a refined expression for the interleaved gate fidelity estimation. Experiments on a superconducting quantum processor validate the theory and demonstrate that fidelities obtained using XEB with single-qubit references agree with those extracted from standard interleaved randomized benchmarking (IRB), while achieving higher precision due to reduced reference-sequence errors. Our results establish theoretical foundation for the single-qubit-based XEB and show that, with appropriate post-processing, it enables a reliable and robust approach for entangling gates benchmarking without the need for multi-qubit Clifford reference sequences.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Cross-entropy benchmarking (XEB) with single-qubit reference sequences is widely used to characterize multi-qubit gates in large-scale quantum processors, despite the lack of a...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.