You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Photonic Quantum Computing Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Sensing Metrology Benchmarking Verification Validation

Magnetodielectric detection of magnetic quadrupole order in Ba(TiO)Cu4(PO4)4 with Cu4O12 square cupolas

DOAJ
Authors: K. Kimura, P. Babkevich, M. Sera, M. Toyoda, K. Yamauchi, G. S. Tucker, J. Martius, T. Fennell, P. Manuel, D. D. Khalyavin, R. D. Johnson, T. Nakano, Y. Nozue, H. M. Rønnow, T. Kimura

Year

2016

Paper ID

25696

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

46

Citations

49

Abstract

Experimental knowledge of magnetoelectric (ME) activity from magnetic multipole moments has so far been limited. Here, Kimura et al. show that a magnetic square cupola cluster such as Cu4O12 realized in Ba(TiO)Cu4(PO4)4is a promising structural unit carrying ME-active magnetic quadrupole moments.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Photonic Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Experimental knowledge of magnetoelectric (ME) activity from magnetic multipole moments has so far been limited.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #25696 #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse... #69031 Amplitude-dependent quantum hyd... #69030 Non-Hermitian Crystalline Braid... #69029 Higher-order Symmetric Quantum ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-13 21:52:14

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.