Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Entropy Information Measures
Measuring the Renyi entropy of a two-site Fermi-Hubbard model on a trapped ion quantum computer
arXiv
Authors: Norbert M. Linke, Sonika Johri, Caroline Figgatt, Kevin A. Landsman, Anne Y. Matsuura, Christopher Monroe
Year
2017
Paper ID
2562
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
97
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The efficient simulation of correlated quantum systems is the most promising near-term application of quantum computers. Here, we present a measurement of the second Renyi entropy of the ground state of the two-site Fermi-Hubbard model on a 5-qubit programmable quantum computer based on trapped ions. Our work illustrates the extraction of a non-linear characteristic of a quantum state using a controlled-swap gate acting on two copies of the state. This scalable measurement of entanglement on a universal quantum computer will, with more qubits, provide insights into many-body quantum systems that are impossible to simulate on classical computers.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Entropy & Information Measures research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2017 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The efficient simulation of correlated quantum systems is the most promising near-term application of quantum computers.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.