Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Sequential Macroscopic Decoherence Renders the Simulated Physical World in the Quantum Field of Consciousness

OpenAlex
Authors: J.J. Mancilla

Year

2026

Paper ID

25515

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

102

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Through a synthesis based on the recognition of underlying structures, the description of fundamental logical mechanisms, the reasoned interconnection of multiple conditions of possibility and the co- inherent relationship between inferences, this essay aims to investigate some of the implications arising from the observation of the informational universe from a unified perspective of the metaphysical architecture of reality. This essay explores how sequential macroscopic decoherence renders the simulated physical world in the quantum field of consciousness through the apparent subject-object separation, the illusion of motion and the linear impression of the passage of time, which primarily structure the experience of subjective reality.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Through a synthesis based on the recognition of underlying structures, the description of fundamental logical mechanisms, the reasoned interconnection of multiple conditions of...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #25515

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.