Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Classical reconstruction of interference patterns of position-wavevector-entangled photon pairs by time-reversal method
arXiv
Authors: Kazuhisa Ogawa, Hirokazu Kobayashi, Akihisa Tomita
Year
2017
Paper ID
25219
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
92
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The quantum interference of entangled photons forms a key phenomenon underlying various quantum-optical technologies. It is known that the quantum interference patterns of entangled photon pairs can be reconstructed classically by the time-reversal method; however, the time-reversal method has been applied only to time-frequency-entangled two-photon systems in previous experiments. Here, for the first time, we apply the time-reversal method to the position-wavevector-entangled two-photon systems: the two-photon Young interferometer and the two-photon beam focusing system. We experimentally demonstrate that the time-reversed systems classically reconstruct the same interference patterns as the position-wavevector-entangled two-photon systems.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2017 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The quantum interference of entangled photons forms a key phenomenon underlying various quantum-optical technologies.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.