Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum State Preparation Representation
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Superscar states in rational polygon billiards - a reality or an illusion?
arXiv
Authors: Stefan Giller
Year
2017
Paper ID
25147
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
174
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The superscars phenomena (Heller, E.J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, (1984) 1515) in the rational polygon billiards (RPB) are analysed using the high energy semiclassical wave functions (SWF) built on classical trajectories forming skeletons. Considering examples of the pseudointegrable billiards such as the Bogomolny-Schmit triangle, the parallelogram and the L-shape billiards as well as the integrable rectangular one the constructed SWFs allow us to verify the idea of Bogomolny and Schmit (Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 244102) of SWFs (superscars) propagating along periodic orbit channels (POC) and vanishing outside of them. It is shown that the superscars effects in RPB appear as natural properties of SWFs built on the periodic skeletons. The latter skeletons are commonly present in RPB and are always composed of POCs. The SWFs built on the periodic skeletons satisfy all the basic principles of the quantum mechanics contrary to the superscar states of Bogomolny and Schmit which break them. Therefore the superscars effects need not to invoke the idea of the superscar states of Bogomolny and Schmit at least in the cases considered in our paper.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2017 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The superscars phenomena (Heller, E.J., Phys.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.