Quick Navigation

Overview Topics Abstract Importance Paper Tools References Reactions Discussion Publication Related

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Superconducting Qubits

Rydberg-atom-based scheme of nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation

arXiv

Authors: P. Z. Zhao, Xiao-Dan Cui, G. F. Xu, Erik Sjöqvist, D. M. Tong

Year

2017

Paper ID

25120

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation provides a means to perform fast and robust quantum gates. It has been implemented in various physical systems, such as trapped ions, nuclear magnetic resonance and superconducting circuits. Another system being adequate for implementation of nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation may be Rydberg atoms, since their internal states have very long coherence time and the Rydberg-mediated interaction facilitates the implementation of a two-qubit gate. Here, we propose a scheme of nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation based on Rydberg atoms, which combines the robustness of nonadiabatic geometric gates with the merits of Rydberg atoms.

Why This Paper Matters

This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
It adds a 2017 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
Nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation provides a means to perform fast and robust quantum gates.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Become a member Sign in

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

[1] DOI https://doi.org/arXiv:1711.04917 [2] arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.04917 [3] Publisher https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.04917

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0

Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.