Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Quantum Machine Learning

A Quantum Extension of Variational Bayes Inference

arXiv
Authors: Hideyuki Miyahara, Yuki Sughiyama

Year

2017

Paper ID

24537

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

92

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Variational Bayes (VB) inference is one of the most important algorithms in machine learning and widely used in engineering and industry. However, VB is known to suffer from the problem of local optima. In this Letter, we generalize VB by using quantum mechanics, and propose a new algorithm, which we call quantum annealing variational Bayes (QAVB) inference. We then show that QAVB drastically improve the performance of VB by applying them to a clustering problem described by a Gaussian mixture model. Finally, we discuss an intuitive understanding on how QAVB works well.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2017 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Variational Bayes (VB) inference is one of the most important algorithms in machine learning and widely used in engineering and industry.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #24537 #69039 SAT, MaxSAT, and SMT for QLDPC ... #69038 Physically Constrained Ensemble... #69034 Hardware-aware Low-latency Quan... #69025 Machine-Learning Optimization a...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.