Quick Navigation

Topics

Superconducting Qubits

High-fidelity dissipative engineering using parametric interactions

arXiv
Authors: E. Doucet, F. Reiter, L. Ranzani, A. Kamal

Year

2018

Paper ID

24163

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

76

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Established methods for dissipative state preparation typically rely on resolving resonances, limiting the target state fidelity due to competition between the stabilization mechanism and uncontrolled dissipation. We propose a protocol devoid of such constraints, using parametric couplings to engineer dissipation for preparation of any maximally entangled two-qubit state. Our scheme allows high-fidelity entanglement generation with short convergence time, continuous control of the target state in the stabilized manifold, and is realizable with state-of-the-art superconducting qubit technology.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Established methods for dissipative state preparation typically rely on resolving resonances, limiting the target state fidelity due to competition between the stabilization...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #24163 #69595 Tantalum as a base material for... #69543 Quantum Information Geometry of... #69536 Quantum Algorithm for Open-Syst... #69534 Readout-Induced Leakage in Supe...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.