Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Positivity violations of the density operator in the Caldeira-Leggett master equation
arXiv
Authors: G. Homa, J. Z. Bernád, L. Lisztes
Year
2018
Paper ID
23973
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
100
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The Caldeira-Leggett master equation as an example of Markovian master equation without Lindblad form is investigated for mathematical consistency. We explore situations both analytically and numerically where the positivity violations of the density operator occur. We reinforce some known knowledge about this problem but also find new surprising cases. Our analytical results are based on the full solution of the Caldeira-Leggett master equation obtained via the method of characteristics. The preservation of positivity is mainly investigated with the help of the density operator's purity and we give also some numerical results about the violation of the Robertson-Schrödinger uncertainty relation.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The Caldeira-Leggett master equation as an example of Markovian master equation without Lindblad form is investigated for mathematical consistency.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.