Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Machine Learning
Fast and High-Fidelity Readout of Single Trapped-Ion Qubit via Machine Learning Methods
arXiv
Authors: Zi-Han Ding, Jin-Ming Cui, Yun-Feng Huang, Chuan-Feng Li, Tao Tu, Guang-Can Guo
Year
2018
Paper ID
23961
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
118
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this work, we introduce machine learning methods to implement readout of a single qubit on 171mathrm{Yb+} trapped-ion system. Different machine learning methods including convolutional neural networks and fully-connected neural networks are compared with traditional methods in the tests. The results show that machine learning methods have higher fidelity, more robust readout results in relatively short time. To obtain a 99% readout fidelity, neural networks only take half of the detection time needed by traditional threshold or maximum likelihood methods. Furthermore, we implement the machine learning algorithms on hardware-based field-programmable gate arrays and an ARM processor. An average readout fidelity of 99.5% with $105$ magnitude trials within 171 μs is demonstrated on the embedded hardware system for 171mathrm{Yb+} ion trap.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this work, we introduce machine learning methods to implement readout of a single qubit on ^171mathrmYb^+ trapped-ion system.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.