Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Thermodynamics
Power and Efficiency of a Thermal Engine with a Coherent Bath
arXiv
Authors: Thomas Guff, Shakib Daryanoosh, Ben Q. Baragiola, Alexei Gilchrist
Year
2018
Paper ID
23942
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
118
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We consider a quantum engine driven by repeated weak interactions with a heat bath of identical three-level atoms. This model was first introduced by Scully et al. [Science, 2003], who showed that coherence between the energy-degenerate ground states serves as a thermodynamic resource that allows operation of a thermal cycle with a coherence-dependent thermalisation temperature. We consider a similar engine out of the quasistatic limit and find that the ground-state coherence also determines the rate of thermalisation, therefore increasing the output power and the engine efficiency only when the thermalisation temperature is reduced; revealing a more nuanced perspective of coherence as a resource. This allows us to optimise the output power by adjusting the coherence and relative stroke durations.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Thermodynamics research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We consider a quantum engine driven by repeated weak interactions with a heat bath of identical three-level atoms.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.