Quick Navigation

Topics

Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing Photonic Quantum Computing Quantum Chemistry Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Resonant confinement of excitonic polariton and ultra-efficient light harvest in artificial photosynthesis

arXiv
Authors: Yong-Cong Chen, Bo Song, Anthony J. Leggett, Ping Ao, Xiaomei Zhu

Year

2018

Paper ID

23918

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

82

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We show that in the recent artificial light-harvesting experiment [Angewandte Chemie Intl. Ed. 55, 2759 (2016)] on organic nanocrystals self-assembled from difluoroboron chromophores, the spontaneous emission of an excited pigment should undergo a two-step process. It would first decay to an excitonic polariton confined by cavity resonance via strong photon-exciton coupling. The captive intermediate could then funnel the energy directly to doped acceptors, leading to the observed over 90% transfer efficiency at less than 1/1000 acceptor-donor ratio. Theoretical, parameter-free analyses are in quantitative agreement with the experiment.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We show that in the recent artificial light-harvesting experiment [Angewandte Chemie Intl.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #23918 #73043 Challenges in the simulation of... #73007 COSMA: Communication-aware Opti... #72994 A Semiclassical Gaussian Wavepa... #72972 Depth-Efficient Quantum Topolog...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.