Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum State Preparation Representation
Meta-Entanglement
arXiv
Authors: Paola Zizzi
Year
2018
Paper ID
23873
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
125
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We give a meta-logical interpretation of the entanglement mechanism of quantum space-time in terms of the sequent calculus of a quantum sub-structural logic. This meta-logical picture is based mainly on the two meta-rules cut and EPR, and on the new meta-theorem teleportation (TEL), built by the use of the above meta-rules, both performed in parallel. The proof of (TEL)-theorem fairly reproduces the protocol of quantum teleportation. In the framework of space-time entanglement, the conclusion of the (TEL)-theorem is that the entangled space-time can convey the quantum teleportation of an unknown quantum state. We also introduce two new structural rules: the Hadamard (H)-rule and the CNOT-rule, the latter being used, together with the cut, in the proof of the new theorem Entanglement (ENT).
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We give a meta-logical interpretation of the entanglement mechanism of quantum space-time in terms of the sequent calculus of a quantum sub-structural logic.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.