Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Machine Learning

Quantum Advantage for the LOCAL Model in Distributed Computing

arXiv
Authors: François Le Gall, Harumichi Nishimura, Ansis Rosmanis

Year

2018

Paper ID

23810

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

104

Citations

N/A

Abstract

There are two central models considered in (fault-free synchronous) distributed computing: the CONGEST model, in which communication channels have limited bandwidth, and the LOCAL model, in which communication channels have unlimited bandwidth. Very recently, Le Gall and Magniez (PODC 2018) showed the superiority of quantum distributed computing over classical distributed computing in the CONGEST model. In this work we show the superiority of quantum distributed computing in the LOCAL model: we exhibit a computational task that can be solved in a constant number of rounds in the quantum setting but requires Ω(n) rounds in the classical setting, where n denotes the size of the network.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • There are two central models considered in (fault-free synchronous) distributed computing: the CONGEST model, in which communication channels have limited bandwidth, and the...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #23810 #69034 Hardware-aware Low-latency Quan... #69025 Machine-Learning Optimization a... #69003 QBugLM: An Agentic Benchmarking... #68993 Tomography of quantum states wi...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.