Quick Navigation

Topics

Superconducting Qubits

The high-coherence fluxonium qubit

arXiv
Authors: Long B. Nguyen, Yen-Hsiang Lin, Aaron Somoroff, Raymond Mencia, Nicholas Grabon, Vladimir E. Manucharyan

Year

2018

Paper ID

23799

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

99

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We report superconducting fluxonium qubits with coherence times largely limited by energy relaxation and reproducibly satisfying T2 > 100 microseconds (T2 > 300 microseconds in one device). Moreover, given the state of the art values of the surface loss tangent and the 1/f flux noise amplitude, coherence can be further improved beyond 1 millisecond. Our results violate a common viewpoint that the number of Josephson junctions in a superconducting circuit - over 100 here - must be minimized for best qubit coherence. We outline how the unique to fluxonium combination of long coherence time and large anharmonicity can benefit both gate-based and adiabatic quantum computing.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We report superconducting fluxonium qubits with coherence times largely limited by energy relaxation and reproducibly satisfying T2 > 100 microseconds (T2 > 300 microseconds in...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #23799 #69595 Tantalum as a base material for... #69543 Quantum Information Geometry of... #69536 Quantum Algorithm for Open-Syst... #69534 Readout-Induced Leakage in Supe...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.