Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Superconducting Qubits
Computational modeling of decay and hybridization in superconducting circuits
arXiv
Authors: Michael G. Scheer, Maxwell B. Block
Year
2018
Paper ID
23772
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
102
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present a framework for modeling superconducting circuits that integrates classical microwave analysis with circuit quantization. Our framework enables the calculation of the lossy eigenmodes of superconducting circuits, and we demonstrate the method by analyzing several circuits relevant to multiplexed, Purcell filtered transmon readout architectures. We show that the transmon relaxation times obtained by our method agree with the established approximation T1 approx C/Re\[Y\(iωq\)\] away from environmental resonances and do not vanish on resonance. We also show that the hybridization of the modes in the readout circuit is highly sensitive to the bandwidth of the Purcell filter.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present a framework for modeling superconducting circuits that integrates classical microwave analysis with circuit quantization.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.