Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Polarization effects in the nonlinear interference of down-converted photons
arXiv
Authors: Anna Paterova, Hongzhi Yang, Chengwu An, Dmitry Kalashnikov, Leonid Krivitsky
Year
2018
Paper ID
23722
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
118
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study polarization effects in the nonlinear interference of photons generated via frequency non-degenerate spontaneous parametric down conversion. Signal and idler photons generated in the visible and infrared (IR) range, are split in different arms of a nonlinear Michelson interferometer. The interference pattern for signal photons is detected, and it is shown to be dependent on the polarization rotation of idler photons, introduced by a birefringent sample. Based on this concept, we realize two new methods for measurement of sample retardation in the IR range by using well-developed and inexpensive components for visible light. The accuracy of the methods meets current industry standards. The developed IR polarimetry technique is relevant to material research, optical inspection, and quality control.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study polarization effects in the nonlinear interference of photons generated via frequency non-degenerate spontaneous parametric down conversion.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.