Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Machine Learning
Peak Quasar Correlation Across the Sky, and in an Earth-Wide Bell Test
arXiv
Authors: Eric Steinbring
Year
2018
Paper ID
23644
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
186
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Viewing two astronomical sources at large enough distance and angular separation can assure, by light-travel-time arguments, the acausality of their emitted photons. Using such photons to set apparatus parameters in a laboratory-based quantum-mechanical experiment could ensure those switch settings are independent and fair, allowing a loophole-free test of Bell's inequality. Quasars are a natural choice for this task, yet at ultimate extent it involves their simultaneous photometry towards opposite directions on the sky, which is untried. Cosmic isotropy can be invoked to set limits there, leaving fairness intact for causal pairs, but with a testable consequence of asymmetric bias: mean brightness correlations found less flat in sky angle than random, more acutely so inside a horizon of 90 degrees. Analysis of one dataset from the Gemini twin telescopes is presented, using over 14 years of archival broadband-optical images, serendipitously sampling thousands of quasars up to 180 degrees apart. These data reject a null result of no correlation with 97.7% confidence, instead consistent with a 3-sigma residual signal of 0.21 mag peaked at 65+/-3 degrees separation. Possible confirmatory observations are pointed to along with the improved experimental protocol of an Earth-wide test.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Viewing two astronomical sources at large enough distance and angular separation can assure, by light-travel-time arguments, the acausality of their emitted photons.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.