Quick Navigation

Overview Topics Abstract Importance Paper Tools References Reactions Discussion Publication Related

Topics

Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing Quantum Chemistry

Transition Energy in Strong and Weak Confinement of Type-I Spherical Core-shell Quantum Dots

arXiv

Authors: T. Shelawati, M. S. Nurisya, C. Kar Tim, A. K. Mazliana

Year

2018

Paper ID

23302

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In this paper, we present a mathematical approach in estimating transition energy of type-I core-shell quantum dots (CSQDs) in strong and weak confinement of charge carriers within the core materials. We will do this by using effective-mass approximation together with a single-band model. The effects of potential step of conduction band and valence band on confinement strength will be discussed. It can be seen at the end of this paper that for a same size CSQDs, CSQDs with bigger potential steps will have stronger carriers confinement and with more localized excitons.

Why This Paper Matters

This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
In this paper, we present a mathematical approach in estimating transition energy of type-I core-shell quantum dots (CSQDs) in strong and weak confinement of charge carriers...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Become a member Sign in

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

[1] DOI https://doi.org/arXiv:1811.06977 [2] arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.06977 [3] Publisher https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.06977

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0

Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.