You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Machine Learning Superconducting Qubits

Measurement-based adaptation protocol with quantum reinforcement learning in a Rigetti quantum computer

arXiv
Authors: J. Olivares-Sánchez, J. Casanova, E. Solano, L. Lamata

Year

2018

Paper ID

23267

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

53

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We present an experimental realization of a measurement-based adaptation protocol with quantum reinforcement learning in a Rigetti cloud quantum computer. The experiment in this few-qubit superconducting chip faithfully reproduces the theoretical proposal, setting the first steps towards a semiautonomous quantum agent. This experiment paves the way towards quantum reinforcement learning with superconducting circuits.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We present an experimental realization of a measurement-based adaptation protocol with quantum reinforcement learning in a Rigetti cloud quantum computer.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #23267 #69034 Hardware-aware Low-latency Quan... #69031 Amplitude-dependent quantum hyd... #69025 Machine-Learning Optimization a... #69022 Contacting Josephson Junctions ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.