Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Machine Learning Superconducting Qubits

Generative model benchmarks for superconducting qubits

arXiv
Authors: Kathleen E. Hamilton, Eugene F. Dumitrescu, Raphael C. Pooser

Year

2018

Paper ID

23150

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

79

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In this work we experimentally demonstrate how generative model training can be used as a benchmark for small (<5 qubits) quantum devices. Performance is quantified using three data analytic metrics: the Kullbeck-Leiber divergence, and two adaptations of the F1 score. Using the 2times2 Bars and Stripes dataset, we determine optimal circuit constructions for generative model training on superconducting qubits by including hardware connectivity constraints into circuit design. We show that on noisy hardware sparsely connected, shallow circuits out-perform denser counterparts.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In this work we experimentally demonstrate how generative model training can be used as a benchmark for small (

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #23150 #78837 TLS loss in superconducting res... #78829 Graphene double quantum dot as ... #78828 Verifiable Sampling for Delegat... #78817 Modelling Josephson Junctions w...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.