Quick Navigation

Topics

Superconducting Qubits

Fast flux control of 3D transmon qubits using a magnetic hose

arXiv
Authors: O. Gargiulo, S. Oleschko, J. Prat-Camps, M. Zanner, G. Kirchmair

Year

2018

Paper ID

23088

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

104

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Fast magnetic flux control is a crucial ingredient for circuit quantum electrodynamics (cQED) systems. So far it has been a challenge to implement this technology with the high coherence 3D cQED architecture. In this paper we control the magnetic field inside a superconducting waveguide cavity using a magnetic hose, which allows fast flux control of 3D transmon qubits on time scales < 100 ns. The hose is designed as an effective microwave filter to not compromise the energy relaxation time of the qubit. The magnetic hose is a promising tool for fast magnetic flux control in various platforms intended for quantum information processing and quantum optics.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Fast magnetic flux control is a crucial ingredient for circuit quantum electrodynamics (cQED) systems.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #23088 #69595 Tantalum as a base material for... #69543 Quantum Information Geometry of... #69536 Quantum Algorithm for Open-Syst... #69534 Readout-Induced Leakage in Supe...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.