Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Simulation
Inferring the smoothness of the autocorrelation function from that of the initial state
arXiv
Authors: K. L. Yang, J. M. Zhang
Year
2018
Paper ID
23070
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
158
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We point out that by the "smoothness means fast decay" principle in Fourier analysis, it is possible to infer the smoothness (or nonsmoothness) of the autocorrelation function from a mere glimpse of the initial state. Specifically, for a generic system with smooth eigenstates, the smoother an initial state is, the faster its decomposition coefficients with respect to the eigenstates of the system decay, and in turn the smoother the autocorrelation function is. The idea is illustrated with three increasingly smooth functions in an infinite square well. By using the Mellin transform, we also find that the nonsmoothness or singularity of the initial state affects the short-time behavior of its autocorrelation function. In particular, a sufficiently nonsmooth or singular initial state could decay in a nonquadratic power law, with the exponent continuously tunable. We now understand the periodic cusps of the autocorrelation function in the quench dynamics of a Bloch state, which was observed previously [Zhang and Yang, EPL 114, 60001 (2016)].
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We point out that by the "smoothness means fast decay" principle in Fourier analysis, it is possible to infer the smoothness (or nonsmoothness) of the autocorrelation function...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.