Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Optimization
Hard combinatorial problems and minor embeddings on lattice graphs
arXiv
Authors: Andrew Lucas
Year
2018
Paper ID
22911
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
109
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Today, hardware constraints are an important limitation on quantum adiabatic optimization algorithms. Firstly, computational problems must be formulated as quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) in the presence of noisy coupling constants. Secondly, the interaction graph of the QUBO must have an effective minor embedding into a two-dimensional nonplanar lattice graph. We describe new strategies for constructing QUBOs for NP-complete/hard combinatorial problems that address both of these challenges. Our results include asymptotically improved embeddings for number partitioning, filling knapsacks, graph coloring, and finding Hamiltonian cycles. These embeddings can be also be found with reduced computational effort. Our new embedding for number partitioning may be more effective on next-generation hardware.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Optimization research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Today, hardware constraints are an important limitation on quantum adiabatic optimization algorithms.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.