Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Optimization

Hard combinatorial problems and minor embeddings on lattice graphs

arXiv
Authors: Andrew Lucas

Year

2018

Paper ID

22911

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

109

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Today, hardware constraints are an important limitation on quantum adiabatic optimization algorithms. Firstly, computational problems must be formulated as quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) in the presence of noisy coupling constants. Secondly, the interaction graph of the QUBO must have an effective minor embedding into a two-dimensional nonplanar lattice graph. We describe new strategies for constructing QUBOs for NP-complete/hard combinatorial problems that address both of these challenges. Our results include asymptotically improved embeddings for number partitioning, filling knapsacks, graph coloring, and finding Hamiltonian cycles. These embeddings can be also be found with reduced computational effort. Our new embedding for number partitioning may be more effective on next-generation hardware.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Optimization research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Today, hardware constraints are an important limitation on quantum adiabatic optimization algorithms.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #22911

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.