Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Software Tools Programming
Detecting Wave Function Collapse Without Prior Knowledge
arXiv
Authors: Charles Wesley Cowan, Roderich Tumulka
Year
2013
Paper ID
2275
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
233
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We are concerned with the problem of detecting with high probability whether a wave function has collapsed or not, in the following framework: A quantum system with a d-dimensional Hilbert space is initially in state ψ; with probability 0<p<1, the state collapses relative to the orthonormal basis b1,...,bd. That is, the final state ψ' is random; it is ψ with probability 1-p and bk (up to a phase) with p times Born's probability |langle bk|ψrangle|2. Now an experiment on the system in state ψ' is desired that provides information about whether or not a collapse has occurred. Elsewhere, we identify and discuss the optimal experiment in case that ψ is either known or random with a known probability distribution. Here we present results about the case that no a priori information about ψ is available, while we regard p and b1,...,bd as known. For certain values of p, we show that the set of ψs for which any experiment E is more reliable than blind guessing is at most half the unit sphere; thus, in this regime, any experiment is of questionable use, if any at all. Remarkably, however, there are other values of p and experiments E such that the set of ψs for which E is more reliable than blind guessing has measure greater than half the sphere, though with a conjectured maximum of 64% of the sphere.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Software Tools & Programming research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We are concerned with the problem of detecting with high probability whether a wave function has collapsed or not, in the following framework: A quantum system with a...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.