Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Energy preserving methods for nonlinear Schrödinger equations
arXiv
Authors: Christophe Besse, Stephane Descombes, Guillaume Dujardin, Ingrid Lacroix-Violet
Year
2018
Paper ID
22746
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
120
Citations
N/A
Abstract
This paper is concerned with the numerical integration in time of nonlinear Schrödinger equations using different methods preserving the energy or a discrete analog of it. The Crank-Nicolson method is a well known method of order 2 but is fully implicit and one may prefer a linearly implicit method like the relaxation method introduced in [10] for the cubic nonlinear Schr{ö}dinger equation. This method is also an energy preserving method and numerical simulations have shown that its order is 2. In this paper we give a rigorous proof of the order of this relaxation method and propose a generalized version that allows to deal with general power law nonlinearites. Numerical simulations for different physical models show the efficiency of these methods.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- This paper is concerned with the numerical integration in time of nonlinear Schrödinger equations using different methods preserving the energy or a discrete analog of it.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.