Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Minimal-backaction work statistics of coherent engines

arXiv
Authors: Milton Aguilar, Franklin L. S. Rodrigues, Eric Lutz

Year

2026

Paper ID

22474

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

129

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Determining the work statistics of quantum engines is challenging due to measurement backaction. We here show that a dynamic Bayesian network-based measurement scheme, which preserves quantum coherence within an engine cycle, is minimally invasive, in the sense that the averaged measured state over one cycle exactly coincides with the unmeasured state. It therefore provides a general framework to investigate energy exchange statistics in quantum machines. This stands in contrast to the standard two-point measurement protocol, whose backaction can be so strong that it generally fails to reproduce the average work output of a coherent motor. It may even alter its mode of operation, causing it to cease functioning as an engine under observation. We further demonstrate that recently proposed universal fluctuation bounds do not necessarily apply to coherent machines.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Determining the work statistics of quantum engines is challenging due to measurement backaction.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #22474

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.