Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Minimal-backaction work statistics of coherent engines
arXiv
Authors: Milton Aguilar, Franklin L. S. Rodrigues, Eric Lutz
Year
2026
Paper ID
22474
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
129
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Determining the work statistics of quantum engines is challenging due to measurement backaction. We here show that a dynamic Bayesian network-based measurement scheme, which preserves quantum coherence within an engine cycle, is minimally invasive, in the sense that the averaged measured state over one cycle exactly coincides with the unmeasured state. It therefore provides a general framework to investigate energy exchange statistics in quantum machines. This stands in contrast to the standard two-point measurement protocol, whose backaction can be so strong that it generally fails to reproduce the average work output of a coherent motor. It may even alter its mode of operation, causing it to cease functioning as an engine under observation. We further demonstrate that recently proposed universal fluctuation bounds do not necessarily apply to coherent machines.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Determining the work statistics of quantum engines is challenging due to measurement backaction.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.