Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Generalised All-Optical Cat Correction
arXiv
Authors: Ari John Boon, Olivier Landon-Cardinal, Nicolás Quesada
Year
2026
Paper ID
22406
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
113
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We have generalised an all-optical telecorrection protocol for the higher orders of the cat code, and show that with these higher orders we can achieve target performance at substantially reduced iteration counts at the cost of a higher mean photon-number. We also introduce a probabilistic scheme for correcting deformation of the state, which highlights two interesting abilities of telecorrection: to encode new sets of transformations, and to change the basis of the code. We find that for a target channel fidelity of 99.9\% over a channel with 1 dB of loss, a third-order cat code requires 70 times fewer telecorrection iterations than a first-order one, at a cost of a 3.6-fold increase in mean photon-number.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Error Correction & Fault Tolerance research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We have generalised an all-optical telecorrection protocol for the higher orders of the cat code, and show that with these higher orders we can achieve target performance at...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.