Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance

Generalised All-Optical Cat Correction

arXiv
Authors: Ari John Boon, Olivier Landon-Cardinal, Nicolás Quesada

Year

2026

Paper ID

22406

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

113

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We have generalised an all-optical telecorrection protocol for the higher orders of the cat code, and show that with these higher orders we can achieve target performance at substantially reduced iteration counts at the cost of a higher mean photon-number. We also introduce a probabilistic scheme for correcting deformation of the state, which highlights two interesting abilities of telecorrection: to encode new sets of transformations, and to change the basis of the code. We find that for a target channel fidelity of 99.9\% over a channel with 1 dB of loss, a third-order cat code requires 70 times fewer telecorrection iterations than a first-order one, at a cost of a 3.6-fold increase in mean photon-number.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Error Correction & Fault Tolerance research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We have generalised an all-optical telecorrection protocol for the higher orders of the cat code, and show that with these higher orders we can achieve target performance at...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #22406 #68397 Optimizing Parallel Execution o...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.