Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Simulation

Error compensation without a time penalty: robust spin-lock-induced crossing in solution NMR

arXiv
Authors: Mohamed Sabba, Christian Bengs, Urvashi D. Heramun, Malcolm H. Levitt

Year

2026

Paper ID

224

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

84

Citations

N/A

Abstract

A modification of the widely-used spin-lock-induced crossing (SLIC) procedure is proposed for the solution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) of strongly coupled nuclear spin systems, including singlet NMR and parahydrogen-enhanced hyperpolarised NMR experiments. The compensated-SLIC (cSLIC) scheme uses a repetitive sequence where the repeated element employs two different radiofrequency field amplitudes. Effective compensation for deviations in the radiofrequency field amplitude is achieved without increasing the overall duration of the SLIC sequence. The advantageous properties of cSLIC are demonstrated by numerical simulations and by representative experiments.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • A modification of the widely-used spin-lock-induced crossing (SLIC) procedure is proposed for the solution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) of strongly coupled nuclear spin...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #224 #69041 Multi-modes Bessel-Gaussian-Orb... #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse... #69038 Physically Constrained Ensemble... #69034 Hardware-aware Low-latency Quan...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.