Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Systematic large flavor fTWA approach to interaction quenches in the Hubbard model

arXiv
Authors: Alexander Osterkorn, Stefan Kehrein

Year

2020

Paper ID

22337

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

88

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We study the nonequilibrium dynamics after an interaction quench in the two-dimensional Hubbard model using the recently introduced fermionic truncated Wigner approximation (fTWA). To assess the range of validity of the method in a systematic way, we consider the SU(N) Hubbard model with the fermion degeneracy N as a natural semiclassical expansion parameter. Using both a numerical and a perturbative analytical approach we show that fTWA is exact at least up to and including the prethermalization dynamics. We discuss the limitations of the method beyond this regime.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We study the nonequilibrium dynamics after an interaction quench in the two-dimensional Hubbard model using the recently introduced fermionic truncated Wigner approximation (fTWA).

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #22337 #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse... #69031 Amplitude-dependent quantum hyd... #69030 Non-Hermitian Crystalline Braid... #69029 Higher-order Symmetric Quantum ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.