Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Is negative kinetic energy meta-stable?
arXiv
Authors: Christian Gross, Alessandro Strumia, Daniele Teresi, Matteo Zirilli
Year
2020
Paper ID
22319
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
128
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We explore the possibility that theories with negative kinetic energy (ghosts) can be meta-stable up to cosmologically long times. In classical mechanics, ghosts undergo spontaneous lockdown rather than run-away if weakly-coupled and non-resonant. Physical examples of this phenomenon are shown. In quantum mechanics this leads to meta-stability similar to vacuum decay. In classical field theory, lockdown is broken by resonances and ghosts behave statistically, drifting towards infinite entropy as no thermal equilibrium exists. We analytically and numerically compute the run-away rate finding that it is cosmologically slow in 4-derivative gravity, where ghosts have gravitational interactions only. In quantum field theory the ghost run-away rate is naively infinite in perturbation theory, analogously to what found in early attempts to compute vacuum tunnelling; we do not know the true rate.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We explore the possibility that theories with negative kinetic energy (ghosts) can be meta-stable up to cosmologically long times.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.