Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Measurement State Discrimination
Secure quantum weak oblivious transfer against individual measurements
arXiv
Authors: Guang Ping He
Year
2013
Paper ID
2227
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
166
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In quantum weak oblivious transfer, Alice sends Bob two bits and Bob can learn one of the bits at his choice. It was found that the security of such a protocol is bounded by 2PAliceast +PBobast geq 2, where PAliceast is the probability with which Alice can guess Bob's choice, and PBobast is the probability with which Bob can guess both of Alice's bits\ given that he learns one of the bits with certainty. Here we propose a protocol and show that as long as Alice is restricted to individual measurements, then both PAliceast and PBobast can be made arbitrarily close to 1/2, so that maximal violation of the security bound can be reached. Even with some limited collective attacks, the security bound can still be violated. Therefore, although our protocol still cannot break the bound in principle when Alice has unlimited cheating power, it is sufficient for achieving secure quantum weak oblivious transfer in practice.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Measurement & State Discrimination research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In quantum weak oblivious transfer, Alice sends Bob two bits and Bob can learn one of the bits at his choice.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.