Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Operator growth bounds in a cartoon matrix model
arXiv
Authors: Andrew Lucas, Andrew Osborne
Year
2020
Paper ID
22238
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
122
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study operator growth in a model of N(N-1)/2 interacting Majorana fermions, which live on the edges of a complete graph of N vertices. Terms in the Hamiltonian are proportional to the product of q fermions which live on the edges of cycles of length q. This model is a cartoon "matrix model": the interaction graph mimics that of a single-trace matrix model, which can be holographically dual to quantum gravity. We prove (non-perturbatively in 1/N, and without averaging over any ensemble) that the scrambling time of this model is at least of order log N, consistent with the fast scrambling conjecture. We comment on apparent similarities and differences between operator growth in our "matrix model" and in the melonic models.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study operator growth in a model of N(N-1)/2 interacting Majorana fermions, which live on the edges of a complete graph of N vertices.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.