Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Superconducting Qubits
Fast Estimation of Sparse Quantum Noise
arXiv
Authors: Robin Harper, Wenjun Yu, Steven T. Flammia
Year
2020
Paper ID
22197
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
158
Citations
N/A
Abstract
As quantum computers approach the fault tolerance threshold, diagnosing and characterizing the noise on large scale quantum devices is increasingly important. One of the most important classes of noise channels is the class of Pauli channels, for reasons of both theoretical tractability and experimental relevance. Here we present a practical algorithm for estimating the s nonzero Pauli error rates in an s-sparse, n-qubit Pauli noise channel, or more generally the s largest Pauli error rates. The algorithm comes with rigorous recovery guarantees and uses only O\(n2\) measurements, O\(s n2\) classical processing time, and Clifford quantum circuits. We experimentally validate a heuristic version of the algorithm that uses simplified Clifford circuits on data from an IBM 14-qubit superconducting device and our open source implementation. These data show that accurate and precise estimation of the probability of arbitrary-weight Pauli errors is possible even when the signal is two orders of magnitude below the measurement noise floor.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- As quantum computers approach the fault tolerance threshold, diagnosing and characterizing the noise on large scale quantum devices is increasingly important.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.