Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Gravity Relativistic Quantum Information
Causality Violation and Nonlinear Quantum Mechanics
arXiv
Authors: Jacques Pienaar
Year
2013
Paper ID
2218
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
234
Citations
N/A
Abstract
It is currently unknown whether the laws of physics permit time travel into the past. While general relativity indicates the theoretical possibility of causality violation, it is now widely accepted that a theory of quantum gravity must play an essential role in such cases. As a striking example, the logical paradoxes usually associated with causality violation can be resolved by quantum effects. We ask whether the explicit construction of a theory that allows causality violation might in turn teach us something about quantum gravity. Taking the toy model of Deutsch as a starting point, in Part I we argue that, despite being a nonlinear modification of quantum mechanics, the model does not imply superluminal signalling and its predictions can be operationally verified by experimenters within an appropriate ontological setting. In Part II we show that the model can be directly applied to scalar quantum fields, provided the fields are sent back in time by an amount much larger than the coherence time of the wavepackets. We propose a generalisation of the model that lifts this constraint and recovers the predictions of standard quantum field theory when the size of the temporal jump is much smaller than the coherence time of the wavepackets. Finally, we discuss an extension of the model to ordinary gravitational time dilation. The resulting model generalises and extends earlier work on the topic and can be tested experimentally using current technology.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Gravity & Relativistic Quantum Information research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- It is currently unknown whether the laws of physics permit time travel into the past.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.