You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Quasi-symmetry groups and many-body scar dynamics
arXiv
Authors: Jie Ren, Chenguang Liang, Chen Fang
Year
2020
Paper ID
22095
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
107
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In quantum systems, a subspace spanned by degenerate eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian may have higher symmetries than those of the Hamiltonian itself. When this enhanced-symmetry group can be generated from local operators, we call it a quasi-symmetry group. When the group is a Lie group, an external field coupled to certain generators of the quasi-symmetry group lifts the degeneracy, and results in exactly periodic dynamics within the degenerate subspace, namely the many-body-scar dynamics (given that Hamiltonian is non-integrable). We provide two related schemes for constructing one-dimensional spin models having on-demand quasi-symmetry groups, with exact periodic evolution of a pre-chosen product or matrix-product state under certain external fields.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In quantum systems, a subspace spanned by degenerate eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian may have higher symmetries than those of the Hamiltonian itself.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.