Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Quantum Differentially Private Sparse Regression Learning
arXiv
Authors: Yuxuan Du, Min-Hsiu Hsieh, Tongliang Liu, Shan You, Dacheng Tao
Year
2020
Paper ID
22014
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
137
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The eligibility of various advanced quantum algorithms will be questioned if they can not guarantee privacy. To fill this knowledge gap, here we devise an efficient quantum differentially private (QDP) Lasso estimator to solve sparse regression tasks. Concretely, given N d-dimensional data points with Nll d, we first prove that the optimal classical and quantum non-private Lasso requires Ω(N+d) and Ω\(sqrt{N}+sqrt{d}\) runtime, respectively. We next prove that the runtime cost of QDP Lasso is dimension independent, i.e., O\(N5/2\), which implies that the QDP Lasso can be faster than both the optimal classical and quantum non-private Lasso. Last, we exhibit that the QDP Lasso attains a near-optimal utility bound {O}\(N-2/3\) with privacy guarantees and discuss the chance to realize it on near-term quantum chips with advantages.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The eligibility of various advanced quantum algorithms will be questioned if they can not guarantee privacy.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.