Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Simulation Quantum State Preparation Representation Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

Inclusion theorems for the Moyal multiplier algebras of generalized Gelfand-Shilov spaces

arXiv
Authors: Michael A. Soloviev

Year

2020

Paper ID

21935

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

82

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We prove that the Moyal multiplier algebras of the generalized Gelfand-Shilov spaces of type S contain Palamodov spaces of type mathcal E and the inclusion maps are continuous. We also give a direct proof that the Palamodov spaces are algebraically and topologically isomorphic to the strong duals of the spaces of convolutors for the corresponding spaces of type S. The obtained results provide an effective way to describe the properties of pseudodifferential operators with symbols in the spaces of type mathcal E.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We prove that the Moyal multiplier algebras of the generalized Gelfand-Shilov spaces of type S contain Palamodov spaces of type mathcal E and the inclusion maps are continuous.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #21935 #78846 Analog quantum simulation of Sh... #78810 Secure Quantum Handshakes: Quan... #78802 Quantum Co-Design of Inhomogene... #78801 Constructing Large and Structur...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.