Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
The operational reality of quantum nonlocality
arXiv
Authors: R. Srikanth
Year
2020
Paper ID
21578
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
102
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Does the remote measurement-disturbance of the quantum state of a system B by measurement on system A entangled with B, constitute a real disturbance - i.e., an objective alteration - of B in an operational sense? Employing information theoretic criteria motivated by operational considerations alone, we argue that the disturbance in question is real for a subset of steerable correlations. This result highlights the distinction between quantum no-signaling and relativistic signal-locality. It furthermore suggests a natural reason why a convex operational theory should be non-signaling: namely, to ensure the consistency between the properties of reduced systems and those of single systems.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Does the remote measurement-disturbance of the quantum state of a system B by measurement on system A entangled with B, constitute a real disturbance - i.e., an objective...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.