Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Determination of Niobium Cavity Magnetic Field Screening via a Dispersively Hybridized Magnonic Sensor
arXiv
Authors: Graeme Flower, Benjamin McAllister, Maxim Goryachev, Michael Tobar
Year
2020
Paper ID
21543
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
180
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A method for determining the internal DC magnetic field inside a superconducting cavity is presented. The method relies on the relationship between magnetic field and frequency of the Kittel mode of a ferrimagnetic sphere, hybridised in the dispersive regime of the superconducting cavity. Results were used to experimentally determine the level of screening a superconducting Nb cavity provides as it changes from perfect diamagnetism to no screening. Two cavity geometries were tested, a cylinder and single post re-entrant cavity. Both demonstrated a consistent value of field that enters the cavity, expected to be the superheating critical field. Hysteresis in the screened field during ramp up and ramp down of the external magnetic field due to trapped vortices was also observed. Some abnormal behaviour was observed in the cylindrical cavity in the form of plateaus in the internal field above the first critical field, and we discuss the potential origin of this behaviour. The measurement approach would be a useful diagnostic for axion dark matter searches, which plan on using superconducting materials but need to know precisely the internal magnetic field.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A method for determining the internal DC magnetic field inside a superconducting cavity is presented.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.