Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Chemistry Quantum Foundations

Multichannel quantum-defect theory for anisotropic interactions

arXiv
Authors: Bo Gao

Year

2020

Paper ID

21381

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

119

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We present a general formulation of multichannel quantum-defect theory (MQDT) for anisotropic long-range potentials. The theory unifies the treatment of atomic and molecular interactions of all types, and greatly expands the set of interactions that can be treated and understood systematically, including complex interactions involving molecules. In one exemplary manifestation, the theory provides a methodology to make the classification of atomic interactions based on the Periodic Table quantitative, instead of qualitative, and to generalize the Table to include molecular classes. Through the concept of effective potential, the theory further establishes a foundation for new classes of quantum theories for chemistry and for a broad range of quantum systems made of either a few or many atoms and/or molecules.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We present a general formulation of multichannel quantum-defect theory (MQDT) for anisotropic long-range potentials.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #21381 #78837 TLS loss in superconducting res... #78817 Modelling Josephson Junctions w... #78814 Construction of isoscattering n... #78811 Autonomous Code Migration for Q...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.