Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum versus classical chirps in a Rydberg atom
arXiv
Authors: Tsafrir Armon, Lazar Friedland
Year
2020
Paper ID
21309
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
104
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The interplay between quantum-mechanical and classical evolutions in a chirped driven Rydberg atom is discussed. It is shown that the system allows two continuing resonant excitation mechanisms, i.e., a successive two-level transitions (ladder climbing) and a continuing classical-like nonlinear phase locking (autoresonance). The persistent 1:1 and 2:1 resonances between the driving and the Keplerian frequencies are studied in detail and characterized in terms of two dimensionless parameters P1,2 representing the driving strength and the nonlinearity in the problem, respectively. The quantum-mechanical rotating wave and the classical single resonance approximations are used to describe the regimes of efficient classical or quantum-mechanical excitation in this two-parameter space.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The interplay between quantum-mechanical and classical evolutions in a chirped driven Rydberg atom is discussed.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.