Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Quantum versus classical chirps in a Rydberg atom

arXiv
Authors: Tsafrir Armon, Lazar Friedland

Year

2020

Paper ID

21309

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

104

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The interplay between quantum-mechanical and classical evolutions in a chirped driven Rydberg atom is discussed. It is shown that the system allows two continuing resonant excitation mechanisms, i.e., a successive two-level transitions (ladder climbing) and a continuing classical-like nonlinear phase locking (autoresonance). The persistent 1:1 and 2:1 resonances between the driving and the Keplerian frequencies are studied in detail and characterized in terms of two dimensionless parameters P1,2 representing the driving strength and the nonlinearity in the problem, respectively. The quantum-mechanical rotating wave and the classical single resonance approximations are used to describe the regimes of efficient classical or quantum-mechanical excitation in this two-parameter space.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The interplay between quantum-mechanical and classical evolutions in a chirped driven Rydberg atom is discussed.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #21309 #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse... #69031 Amplitude-dependent quantum hyd... #69030 Non-Hermitian Crystalline Braid... #69029 Higher-order Symmetric Quantum ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.