Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Complexity Computational Theory
An Optimal Separation of Randomized and Quantum Query Complexity
arXiv
Authors: Alexander A. Sherstov, Andrey A. Storozhenko, Pei Wu
Year
2020
Paper ID
21256
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
204
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We prove that for every decision tree, the absolute values of the Fourier coefficients of a given order ellgeq1 sum to at most cellsqrt{binom{d}{ell}\(1+log n\)ell-1}, where n is the number of variables, d is the tree depth, and c>0 is an absolute constant. This bound is essentially tight and settles a conjecture due to Tal (arxiv 2019; FOCS 2020). The bounds prior to our work degraded rapidly with ell, becoming trivial already at ell=sqrt{d}. As an application, we obtain, for every integer kgeq1, a partial Boolean function on n bits that has bounded-error quantum query complexity at most k and randomized query complexity Ω\(n^{1-frac{1}{2k}}\). This separation of bounded-error quantum versus randomized query complexity is best possible, by the results of Aaronson and Ambainis (STOC 2015) and Bravyi, Gosset, Grier, and Schaeffer (2021). Prior to our work, the best known separation was polynomially weaker: O(1) versus Ω\(n2/3-ε\) for any ε>0 (Tal, FOCS 2020). As another application, we obtain an essentially optimal separation of O\(log n\) versus Ω\(n1-ε\) for bounded-error quantum versus randomized communication complexity, for any ε>0. The best previous separation was polynomially weaker: O\(log n\) versus Ω\(n2/3-ε\) (implicit in Tal, FOCS 2020).
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We prove that for every decision tree, the absolute values of the Fourier coefficients of a given order ellgeq1 sum to at most c^ellsqrtbinomdell(1+log n^ell-1), where n is the...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.