Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Analytical view on N bodies interacting with quantum cavity in tight-binding model

arXiv
Authors: Krzysztof Pomorski

Year

2020

Paper ID

21195

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

101

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Dynamics of N bodies interacting with quantum cavity is presented. The rotating frame approximation is not used and obtained solutions are the most basic in the framework of generalized Jaynes-Cummings tight-binding model. All presented solutions are entirely analytical and are expressed in terms of elementary functions. Presented scheme can easily be generalized into N bodies (qubits) with M energetic levels interacting with quantum electromagnetic cavity with K energetic levels. Presented framework can be used for construction of software modeling quantum communication between semi-conductor single-electron position-based qubits. Keywords: Jaynes-Cummings tight-binding model, quantum communication, Rabi oscillations, position-based qubit, CMOS quantum computer, single-electron devices

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Dynamics of N bodies interacting with quantum cavity is presented.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #21195 #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse... #69031 Amplitude-dependent quantum hyd... #69030 Non-Hermitian Crystalline Braid... #69029 Higher-order Symmetric Quantum ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.